| 1 |
$Id$ |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Network Working Group C. Kalt |
| 4 |
Request for Comments: 2813 April 2000 |
| 5 |
Updates: 1459 |
| 6 |
Category: Informational |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Internet Relay Chat: Server Protocol |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Status of this Memo |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does |
| 13 |
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this |
| 14 |
memo is unlimited. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Copyright Notice |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Abstract |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
While based on the client-server model, the IRC (Internet Relay Chat) |
| 23 |
protocol allows servers to connect to each other effectively forming |
| 24 |
a network. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
This document defines the protocol used by servers to talk to each |
| 27 |
other. It was originally a superset of the client protocol but has |
| 28 |
evolved differently. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
First formally documented in May 1993 as part of RFC 1459 [IRC], most |
| 31 |
of the changes brought since then can be found in this document as |
| 32 |
development was focused on making the protocol scale better. Better |
| 33 |
scalability has allowed existing world-wide networks to keep growing |
| 34 |
and reach sizes which defy the old specification. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Table of Contents |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
1. Introduction ............................................... 3 |
| 39 |
2. Global database ............................................ 3 |
| 40 |
2.1 Servers ................................................ 3 |
| 41 |
2.2 Clients ................................................ 4 |
| 42 |
2.2.1 Users ............................................. 4 |
| 43 |
2.2.2 Services .......................................... 4 |
| 44 |
2.3 Channels ............................................... 4 |
| 45 |
3. The IRC Server Specification ............................... 5 |
| 46 |
3.1 Overview ............................................... 5 |
| 47 |
3.2 Character codes ........................................ 5 |
| 48 |
3.3 Messages ............................................... 5 |
| 49 |
3.3.1 Message format in Augmented BNF ................... 6 |
| 50 |
3.4 Numeric replies ........................................ 7 |
| 51 |
4. Message Details ............................................ 7 |
| 52 |
4.1 Connection Registration ................................ 8 |
| 53 |
4.1.1 Password message .................................. 8 |
| 54 |
4.1.2 Server message .................................... 9 |
| 55 |
4.1.3 Nick .............................................. 10 |
| 56 |
4.1.4 Service message ................................... 11 |
| 57 |
4.1.5 Quit .............................................. 12 |
| 58 |
4.1.6 Server quit message ............................... 13 |
| 59 |
4.2 Channel operations ..................................... 14 |
| 60 |
4.2.1 Join message ...................................... 14 |
| 61 |
4.2.2 Njoin message ..................................... 15 |
| 62 |
4.2.3 Mode message ...................................... 16 |
| 63 |
5. Implementation details .................................... 16 |
| 64 |
5.1 Connection 'Liveness' .................................. 16 |
| 65 |
5.2 Accepting a client to server connection ................ 16 |
| 66 |
5.2.1 Users ............................................. 16 |
| 67 |
5.2.2 Services .......................................... 17 |
| 68 |
5.3 Establishing a server-server connection. ............... 17 |
| 69 |
5.3.1 Link options ...................................... 17 |
| 70 |
5.3.1.1 Compressed server to server links ............ 18 |
| 71 |
5.3.1.2 Anti abuse protections ....................... 18 |
| 72 |
5.3.2 State information exchange when connecting ........ 18 |
| 73 |
5.4 Terminating server-client connections .................. 19 |
| 74 |
5.5 Terminating server-server connections .................. 19 |
| 75 |
5.6 Tracking nickname changes .............................. 19 |
| 76 |
5.7 Tracking recently used nicknames ....................... 20 |
| 77 |
5.8 Flood control of clients ............................... 20 |
| 78 |
5.9 Non-blocking lookups ................................... 21 |
| 79 |
5.9.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups ............................ 21 |
| 80 |
5.9.2 Username (Ident) lookups .......................... 21 |
| 81 |
6. Current problems ........................................... 21 |
| 82 |
6.1 Scalability ............................................ 21 |
| 83 |
6.2 Labels ................................................. 22 |
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
6.2.1 Nicknames ......................................... 22 |
| 86 |
6.2.2 Channels .......................................... 22 |
| 87 |
6.2.3 Servers ........................................... 22 |
| 88 |
6.3 Algorithms ............................................. 22 |
| 89 |
7. Security Considerations .................................... 23 |
| 90 |
7.1 Authentication ......................................... 23 |
| 91 |
7.2 Integrity .............................................. 23 |
| 92 |
8. Current support and availability ........................... 24 |
| 93 |
9. Acknowledgements ........................................... 24 |
| 94 |
10. References ................................................ 24 |
| 95 |
11. Author's Address .......................................... 25 |
| 96 |
12. Full Copyright Statement ................................... 26 |
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
1. Introduction |
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
This document is intended for people working on implementing an IRC |
| 101 |
server but will also be useful to anyone implementing an IRC service. |
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
Servers provide the three basic services required for realtime |
| 104 |
conferencing defined by the "Internet Relay Chat: Architecture" |
| 105 |
[IRC-ARCH]: client locator (via the client protocol [IRC-CLIENT]), |
| 106 |
message relaying (via the server protocol defined in this document) |
| 107 |
and channel hosting and management (following specific rules [IRC- |
| 108 |
CHAN]). |
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
2. Global database |
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
Although the IRC Protocol defines a fairly distributed model, each |
| 113 |
server maintains a "global state database" about the whole IRC |
| 114 |
network. This database is, in theory, identical on all servers. |
| 115 |
|
| 116 |
2.1 Servers |
| 117 |
|
| 118 |
Servers are uniquely identified by their name which has a maximum |
| 119 |
length of sixty three (63) characters. See the protocol grammar |
| 120 |
rules (section 3.3.1) for what may and may not be used in a server |
| 121 |
name. |
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
Each server is typically known by all other servers, however it is |
| 124 |
possible to define a "hostmask" to group servers together according |
| 125 |
to their name. Inside the hostmasked area, all the servers have a |
| 126 |
name which matches the hostmask, and any other server with a name |
| 127 |
matching the hostmask SHALL NOT be connected to the IRC network |
| 128 |
outside the hostmasked area. Servers which are outside the area have |
| 129 |
no knowledge of the individual servers present inside the area, |
| 130 |
instead they are presented with a virtual server which has the |
| 131 |
hostmask for name. |
| 132 |
|
| 133 |
2.2 Clients |
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
For each client, all servers MUST have the following information: a |
| 136 |
netwide unique identifier (whose format depends on the type of |
| 137 |
client) and the server to which the client is connected. |
| 138 |
|
| 139 |
2.2.1 Users |
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
Each user is distinguished from other users by a unique nickname |
| 142 |
having a maximum length of nine (9) characters. See the protocol |
| 143 |
grammar rules (section 3.3.1) for what may and may not be used in a |
| 144 |
nickname. In addition to the nickname, all servers MUST have the |
| 145 |
following information about all users: the name of the host that the |
| 146 |
user is running on, the username of the user on that host, and the |
| 147 |
server to which the client is connected. |
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
2.2.2 Services |
| 150 |
|
| 151 |
Each service is distinguished from other services by a service name |
| 152 |
composed of a nickname and a server name. The nickname has a maximum |
| 153 |
length of nine (9) characters. See the protocol grammar rules |
| 154 |
(section 3.3.1) for what may and may not be used in a nickname. The |
| 155 |
server name used to compose the service name is the name of the |
| 156 |
server to which the service is connected. In addition to this |
| 157 |
service name all servers MUST know the service type. |
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
Services differ from users by the format of their identifier, but |
| 160 |
more importantly services and users don't have the same type of |
| 161 |
access to the server: services can request part or all of the global |
| 162 |
state information that a server maintains, but have a more restricted |
| 163 |
set of commands available to them (See "IRC Client Protocol" [IRC- |
| 164 |
CLIENT] for details on which) and are not allowed to join channels. |
| 165 |
Finally services are not usually subject to the "Flood control" |
| 166 |
mechanism described in section 5.8. |
| 167 |
|
| 168 |
2.3 Channels |
| 169 |
|
| 170 |
Alike services, channels have a scope [IRC-CHAN] and are not |
| 171 |
necessarily known to all servers. When a channel existence is known |
| 172 |
to a server, the server MUST keep track of the channel members, as |
| 173 |
well as the channel modes. |
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
3. The IRC Server Specification |
| 176 |
|
| 177 |
3.1 Overview |
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
The protocol as described herein is for use with server to server |
| 180 |
connections. For client to server connections, see the IRC Client |
| 181 |
Protocol specification. |
| 182 |
|
| 183 |
There are, however, more restrictions on client connections (which |
| 184 |
are considered to be untrustworthy) than on server connections. |
| 185 |
|
| 186 |
3.2 Character codes |
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
No specific character set is specified. The protocol is based on a a |
| 189 |
set of codes which are composed of eight (8) bits, making up an |
| 190 |
octet. Each message may be composed of any number of these octets; |
| 191 |
however, some octet values are used for control codes which act as |
| 192 |
message delimiters. |
| 193 |
|
| 194 |
Regardless of being an 8-bit protocol, the delimiters and keywords |
| 195 |
are such that protocol is mostly usable from US-ASCII terminal and a |
| 196 |
telnet connection. |
| 197 |
|
| 198 |
Because of IRC's Scandinavian origin, the characters {}|^ are |
| 199 |
considered to be the lower case equivalents of the characters []\~, |
| 200 |
respectively. This is a critical issue when determining the |
| 201 |
equivalence of two nicknames, or channel names. |
| 202 |
|
| 203 |
3.3 Messages |
| 204 |
|
| 205 |
Servers and clients send each other messages which may or may not |
| 206 |
generate a reply. Most communication between servers do not generate |
| 207 |
any reply, as servers mostly perform routing tasks for the clients. |
| 208 |
|
| 209 |
Each IRC message may consist of up to three main parts: the prefix |
| 210 |
(OPTIONAL), the command, and the command parameters (maximum of |
| 211 |
fifteen (15)). The prefix, command, and all parameters are separated |
| 212 |
by one ASCII space character (0x20) each. |
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
The presence of a prefix is indicated with a single leading ASCII |
| 215 |
colon character (':', 0x3b), which MUST be the first character of the |
| 216 |
message itself. There MUST be NO gap (whitespace) between the colon |
| 217 |
and the prefix. The prefix is used by servers to indicate the true |
| 218 |
origin of the message. If the prefix is missing from the message, it |
| 219 |
is assumed to have originated from the connection from which it was |
| 220 |
received. Clients SHOULD not use a prefix when sending a message |
| 221 |
from themselves; if they use one, the only valid prefix is the |
| 222 |
registered nickname associated with the client. |
| 223 |
|
| 224 |
When a server receives a message, it MUST identify its source using |
| 225 |
the (eventually assumed) prefix. If the prefix cannot be found in |
| 226 |
the server's internal database, it MUST be discarded, and if the |
| 227 |
prefix indicates the message comes from an (unknown) server, the link |
| 228 |
from which the message was received MUST be dropped. Dropping a link |
| 229 |
in such circumstances is a little excessive but necessary to maintain |
| 230 |
the integrity of the network and to prevent future problems. Another |
| 231 |
common error condition is that the prefix found in the server's |
| 232 |
internal database identifies a different source (typically a source |
| 233 |
registered from a different link than from which the message |
| 234 |
arrived). If the message was received from a server link and the |
| 235 |
prefix identifies a client, a KILL message MUST be issued for the |
| 236 |
client and sent to all servers. In other cases, the link from which |
| 237 |
the message arrived SHOULD be dropped for clients, and MUST be |
| 238 |
dropped for servers. In all cases, the message MUST be discarded. |
| 239 |
|
| 240 |
The command MUST either be a valid IRC command or a three (3) digit |
| 241 |
number represented in ASCII text. |
| 242 |
|
| 243 |
IRC messages are always lines of characters terminated with a CR-LF |
| 244 |
(Carriage Return - Line Feed) pair, and these messages SHALL NOT |
| 245 |
exceed 512 characters in length, counting all characters including |
| 246 |
the trailing CR-LF. Thus, there are 510 characters maximum allowed |
| 247 |
for the command and its parameters. There is no provision for |
| 248 |
continuation message lines. See section 5 for more details about |
| 249 |
current implementations. |
| 250 |
|
| 251 |
3.3.1 Message format in Augmented BNF |
| 252 |
|
| 253 |
The protocol messages must be extracted from the contiguous stream of |
| 254 |
octets. The current solution is to designate two characters, CR and |
| 255 |
LF, as message separators. Empty messages are silently ignored, |
| 256 |
which permits use of the sequence CR-LF between messages without |
| 257 |
extra problems. |
| 258 |
|
| 259 |
The extracted message is parsed into the components <prefix>, |
| 260 |
<command> and list of parameters (<params>). |
| 261 |
|
| 262 |
The Augmented BNF representation for this is found in "IRC Client |
| 263 |
Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT]. |
| 264 |
|
| 265 |
The extended prefix (["!" user "@" host ]) MUST NOT be used in server |
| 266 |
to server communications and is only intended for server to client |
| 267 |
messages in order to provide clients with more useful information |
| 268 |
about who a message is from without the need for additional queries. |
| 269 |
|
| 270 |
3.4 Numeric replies |
| 271 |
|
| 272 |
Most of the messages sent to the server generate a reply of some |
| 273 |
sort. The most common reply is the numeric reply, used for both |
| 274 |
errors and normal replies. The numeric reply MUST be sent as one |
| 275 |
message consisting of the sender prefix, the three digit numeric, and |
| 276 |
the target of the reply. A numeric reply is not allowed to originate |
| 277 |
from a client; any such messages received by a server are silently |
| 278 |
dropped. In all other respects, a numeric reply is just like a normal |
| 279 |
message, except that the keyword is made up of 3 numeric digits |
| 280 |
rather than a string of letters. A list of different replies is |
| 281 |
supplied in "IRC Client Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT]. |
| 282 |
|
| 283 |
4. Message Details |
| 284 |
|
| 285 |
All the messages recognized by the IRC server and client are |
| 286 |
described in the IRC Client Protocol specification. |
| 287 |
|
| 288 |
Where the reply ERR_NOSUCHSERVER is returned, it means that the |
| 289 |
target of the message could not be found. The server MUST NOT send |
| 290 |
any other replies after this error for that command. |
| 291 |
|
| 292 |
The server to which a client is connected is required to parse the |
| 293 |
complete message, returning any appropriate errors. If the server |
| 294 |
encounters a fatal error while parsing a message, an error MUST be |
| 295 |
sent back to the client and the parsing terminated. A fatal error |
| 296 |
may follow from incorrect command, a destination which is otherwise |
| 297 |
unknown to the server (server, client or channel names fit this |
| 298 |
category), not enough parameters or incorrect privileges. |
| 299 |
|
| 300 |
If a full set of parameters is presented, then each MUST be checked |
| 301 |
for validity and appropriate responses sent back to the client. In |
| 302 |
the case of messages which use parameter lists using the comma as an |
| 303 |
item separator, a reply MUST be sent for each item. |
| 304 |
|
| 305 |
In the examples below, some messages appear using the full format: |
| 306 |
|
| 307 |
:Name COMMAND parameter list |
| 308 |
|
| 309 |
Such examples represent a message from "Name" in transit between |
| 310 |
servers, where it is essential to include the name of the original |
| 311 |
sender of the message so remote servers may send back a reply along |
| 312 |
the correct path. |
| 313 |
|
| 314 |
The message details for client to server communication are described |
| 315 |
in the "IRC Client Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT]. Some sections in the |
| 316 |
following pages apply to some of these messages, they are additions |
| 317 |
to the message specifications which are only relevant to server to |
| 318 |
|
| 319 |
server communication, or to the server implementation. The messages |
| 320 |
which are introduced here are only used for server to server |
| 321 |
communication. |
| 322 |
|
| 323 |
4.1 Connection Registration |
| 324 |
|
| 325 |
The commands described here are used to register a connection with |
| 326 |
another IRC server. |
| 327 |
|
| 328 |
4.1.1 Password message |
| 329 |
|
| 330 |
Command: PASS |
| 331 |
Parameters: <password> <version> <flags> [<options>] |
| 332 |
|
| 333 |
The PASS command is used to set a 'connection password'. The |
| 334 |
password MUST be set before any attempt to register the connection is |
| 335 |
made. Currently this means that servers MUST send a PASS command |
| 336 |
before any SERVER command. Only one (1) PASS command SHALL be |
| 337 |
accepted from a connection. |
| 338 |
|
| 339 |
The last three (3) parameters MUST be ignored if received from a |
| 340 |
client (e.g. a user or a service). They are only relevant when |
| 341 |
received from a server. |
| 342 |
|
| 343 |
The <version> parameter is a string of at least four (4) characters, |
| 344 |
and up to fourteen (14) characters. The first four (4) characters |
| 345 |
MUST be digits and indicate the protocol version known by the server |
| 346 |
issuing the message. The protocol described by this document is |
| 347 |
version 2.10 which is encoded as "0210". The remaining OPTIONAL |
| 348 |
characters are implementation dependent and should describe the |
| 349 |
software version number. |
| 350 |
|
| 351 |
The <flags> parameter is a string of up to one hundred (100) |
| 352 |
characters. It is composed of two substrings separated by the |
| 353 |
character "|" (%x7C). If present, the first substring MUST be the |
| 354 |
name of the implementation. The reference implementation (See |
| 355 |
Section 8, "Current support and availability") uses the string "IRC". |
| 356 |
If a different implementation is written, which needs an identifier, |
| 357 |
then that identifier should be registered through publication of an |
| 358 |
RFC. The second substring is implementation dependent. Both |
| 359 |
substrings are OPTIONAL, but the character "|" is REQUIRED. The |
| 360 |
character "|" MUST NOT appear in either substring. |
| 361 |
|
| 362 |
Finally, the last parameter, <options>, is used for link options. |
| 363 |
The only options defined by the protocol are link compression (using |
| 364 |
the character "Z"), and an abuse protection flag (using the character |
| 365 |
|
| 366 |
"P"). See sections 5.3.1.1 (Compressed server to server links) and |
| 367 |
5.3.1.2 (Anti abuse protections) respectively for more information on |
| 368 |
these options. |
| 369 |
|
| 370 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 371 |
|
| 372 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED |
| 373 |
|
| 374 |
Example: |
| 375 |
|
| 376 |
PASS moresecretpassword 0210010000 IRC|aBgH$ Z |
| 377 |
|
| 378 |
4.1.2 Server message |
| 379 |
|
| 380 |
Command: SERVER |
| 381 |
Parameters: <servername> <hopcount> <token> <info> |
| 382 |
|
| 383 |
The SERVER command is used to register a new server. A new connection |
| 384 |
introduces itself as a server to its peer. This message is also used |
| 385 |
to pass server data over whole net. When a new server is connected |
| 386 |
to net, information about it MUST be broadcasted to the whole |
| 387 |
network. |
| 388 |
|
| 389 |
The <info> parameter may contain space characters. |
| 390 |
|
| 391 |
<hopcount> is used to give all servers some internal information on |
| 392 |
how far away each server is. Local peers have a value of 0, and each |
| 393 |
passed server increments the value. With a full server list, it |
| 394 |
would be possible to construct a map of the entire server tree, but |
| 395 |
hostmasks prevent this from being done. |
| 396 |
|
| 397 |
The <token> parameter is an unsigned number used by servers as an |
| 398 |
identifier. This identifier is subsequently used to reference a |
| 399 |
server in the NICK and SERVICE messages sent between servers. Server |
| 400 |
tokens only have a meaning for the point-to-point peering they are |
| 401 |
used and MUST be unique for that connection. They are not global. |
| 402 |
|
| 403 |
The SERVER message MUST only be accepted from either (a) a connection |
| 404 |
which is yet to be registered and is attempting to register as a |
| 405 |
server, or (b) an existing connection to another server, in which |
| 406 |
case the SERVER message is introducing a new server behind that |
| 407 |
server. |
| 408 |
|
| 409 |
Most errors that occur with the receipt of a SERVER command result in |
| 410 |
the connection being terminated by the destination host (target |
| 411 |
SERVER). Because of the severity of such event, error replies are |
| 412 |
usually sent using the "ERROR" command rather than a numeric. |
| 413 |
|
| 414 |
If a SERVER message is parsed and it attempts to introduce a server |
| 415 |
which is already known to the receiving server, the connection, from |
| 416 |
which that message arrived, MUST be closed (following the correct |
| 417 |
procedures), since a duplicate route to a server has been formed and |
| 418 |
the acyclic nature of the IRC tree breaks. In some conditions, the |
| 419 |
connection from which the already known server has registered MAY be |
| 420 |
closed instead. It should be noted that this kind of error can also |
| 421 |
be the result of a second running server, problem which cannot be |
| 422 |
fixed within the protocol and typically requires human intervention. |
| 423 |
This type of problem is particularly insidious, as it can quite |
| 424 |
easily result in part of the IRC network to be isolated, with one of |
| 425 |
the two servers connected to each partition therefore making it |
| 426 |
impossible for the two parts to unite. |
| 427 |
|
| 428 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 429 |
|
| 430 |
ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED |
| 431 |
|
| 432 |
Example: |
| 433 |
|
| 434 |
SERVER test.oulu.fi 1 1 :Experimental server ; New server |
| 435 |
test.oulu.fi introducing itself and |
| 436 |
attempting to register. |
| 437 |
|
| 438 |
:tolsun.oulu.fi SERVER csd.bu.edu 5 34 :BU Central Server ; Server |
| 439 |
tolsun.oulu.fi is our uplink for |
| 440 |
csd.bu.edu which is 5 hops away. The |
| 441 |
token "34" will be used by |
| 442 |
tolsun.oulu.fi when introducing new |
| 443 |
users or services connected to |
| 444 |
csd.bu.edu. |
| 445 |
|
| 446 |
4.1.3 Nick |
| 447 |
|
| 448 |
Command: NICK |
| 449 |
Parameters: <nickname> <hopcount> <username> <host> <servertoken> |
| 450 |
<umode> <realname> |
| 451 |
|
| 452 |
This form of the NICK message MUST NOT be allowed from user |
| 453 |
connections. However, it MUST be used instead of the NICK/USER pair |
| 454 |
to notify other servers of new users joining the IRC network. |
| 455 |
|
| 456 |
This message is really the combination of three distinct messages: |
| 457 |
NICK, USER and MODE [IRC-CLIENT]. |
| 458 |
|
| 459 |
The <hopcount> parameter is used by servers to indicate how far away |
| 460 |
a user is from its home server. A local connection has a hopcount of |
| 461 |
0. The hopcount value is incremented by each passed server. |
| 462 |
|
| 463 |
The <servertoken> parameter replaces the <servername> parameter of |
| 464 |
the USER (See section 4.1.2 for more information on server tokens). |
| 465 |
|
| 466 |
Examples: |
| 467 |
|
| 468 |
NICK syrk 5 kalt millennium.stealth.net 34 +i :Christophe Kalt ; New |
| 469 |
user with nickname "syrk", username |
| 470 |
"kalt", connected from host |
| 471 |
"millennium.stealth.net" to server |
| 472 |
"34" ("csd.bu.edu" according to the |
| 473 |
previous example). |
| 474 |
|
| 475 |
:krys NICK syrk ; The other form of the NICK message, |
| 476 |
as defined in "IRC Client Protocol" |
| 477 |
[IRC-CLIENT] and used between |
| 478 |
servers: krys changed his nickname to |
| 479 |
syrk |
| 480 |
|
| 481 |
4.1.4 Service message |
| 482 |
|
| 483 |
Command: SERVICE |
| 484 |
Parameters: <servicename> <servertoken> <distribution> <type> |
| 485 |
<hopcount> <info> |
| 486 |
|
| 487 |
The SERVICE command is used to introduce a new service. This form of |
| 488 |
the SERVICE message SHOULD NOT be allowed from client (unregistered, |
| 489 |
or registered) connections. However, it MUST be used between servers |
| 490 |
to notify other servers of new services joining the IRC network. |
| 491 |
|
| 492 |
The <servertoken> is used to identify the server to which the service |
| 493 |
is connected. (See section 4.1.2 for more information on server |
| 494 |
tokens). |
| 495 |
|
| 496 |
The <hopcount> parameter is used by servers to indicate how far away |
| 497 |
a service is from its home server. A local connection has a hopcount |
| 498 |
of 0. The hopcount value is incremented by each passed server. |
| 499 |
|
| 500 |
The <distribution> parameter is used to specify the visibility of a |
| 501 |
service. The service may only be known to servers which have a name |
| 502 |
matching the distribution. For a matching server to have knowledge |
| 503 |
of the service, the network path between that server and the server |
| 504 |
to which the service is connected MUST be composed of servers whose |
| 505 |
names all match the mask. Plain "*" is used when no restriction is |
| 506 |
wished. |
| 507 |
|
| 508 |
The <type> parameter is currently reserved for future usage. |
| 509 |
|
| 510 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 511 |
|
| 512 |
ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS |
| 513 |
ERR_ERRONEUSNICKNAME |
| 514 |
RPL_YOURESERVICE RPL_YOURHOST |
| 515 |
RPL_MYINFO |
| 516 |
|
| 517 |
Example: |
| 518 |
|
| 519 |
SERVICE dict@irc.fr 9 *.fr 0 1 :French Dictionary r" registered on |
| 520 |
server "9" is being announced to |
| 521 |
another server. This service will |
| 522 |
only be available on servers whose |
| 523 |
name matches "*.fr". |
| 524 |
|
| 525 |
4.1.5 Quit |
| 526 |
|
| 527 |
Command: QUIT |
| 528 |
Parameters: [<Quit Message>] |
| 529 |
|
| 530 |
A client session ends with a quit message. The server MUST close the |
| 531 |
connection to a client which sends a QUIT message. If a "Quit |
| 532 |
Message" is given, this will be sent instead of the default message, |
| 533 |
the nickname or service name. |
| 534 |
|
| 535 |
When "netsplit" (See Section 4.1.6) occur, the "Quit Message" is |
| 536 |
composed of the names of two servers involved, separated by a space. |
| 537 |
The first name is that of the server which is still connected and the |
| 538 |
second name is either that of the server which has become |
| 539 |
disconnected or that of the server to which the leaving client was |
| 540 |
connected: |
| 541 |
|
| 542 |
<Quit Message> = ":" servername SPACE servername |
| 543 |
|
| 544 |
Because the "Quit Message" has a special meaning for "netsplits", |
| 545 |
servers SHOULD NOT allow a client to use a <Quit Message> in the |
| 546 |
format described above. |
| 547 |
|
| 548 |
If, for some other reason, a client connection is closed without the |
| 549 |
client issuing a QUIT command (e.g. client dies and EOF occurs on |
| 550 |
socket), the server is REQUIRED to fill in the quit message with some |
| 551 |
sort of message reflecting the nature of the event which caused it to |
| 552 |
happen. Typically, this is done by reporting a system specific |
| 553 |
error. |
| 554 |
|
| 555 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 556 |
|
| 557 |
None. |
| 558 |
|
| 559 |
Examples: |
| 560 |
|
| 561 |
:WiZ QUIT :Gone to have lunch ; Preferred message format. |
| 562 |
|
| 563 |
4.1.6 Server quit message |
| 564 |
|
| 565 |
Command: SQUIT |
| 566 |
Parameters: <server> <comment> |
| 567 |
|
| 568 |
The SQUIT message has two distinct uses. |
| 569 |
|
| 570 |
The first one (described in "Internet Relay Chat: Client Protocol" |
| 571 |
[IRC-CLIENT]) allows operators to break a local or remote server |
| 572 |
link. This form of the message is also eventually used by servers to |
| 573 |
break a remote server link. |
| 574 |
|
| 575 |
The second use of this message is needed to inform other servers when |
| 576 |
a "network split" (also known as "netsplit") occurs, in other words |
| 577 |
to inform other servers about quitting or dead servers. If a server |
| 578 |
wishes to break the connection to another server it MUST send a SQUIT |
| 579 |
message to the other server, using the name of the other server as |
| 580 |
the server parameter, which then closes its connection to the |
| 581 |
quitting server. |
| 582 |
|
| 583 |
The <comment> is filled in by servers which SHOULD place an error or |
| 584 |
similar message here. |
| 585 |
|
| 586 |
Both of the servers which are on either side of the connection being |
| 587 |
closed are REQUIRED to send out a SQUIT message (to all its other |
| 588 |
server connections) for all other servers which are considered to be |
| 589 |
behind that link. |
| 590 |
|
| 591 |
Similarly, a QUIT message MAY be sent to the other still connected |
| 592 |
servers on behalf of all clients behind that quitting link. In |
| 593 |
addition to this, all channel members of a channel which lost a |
| 594 |
member due to the "split" MUST be sent a QUIT message. Messages to |
| 595 |
channel members are generated by each client's local server. |
| 596 |
|
| 597 |
If a server connection is terminated prematurely (e.g., the server on |
| 598 |
the other end of the link died), the server which detects this |
| 599 |
disconnection is REQUIRED to inform the rest of the network that the |
| 600 |
connection has closed and fill in the comment field with something |
| 601 |
appropriate. |
| 602 |
|
| 603 |
When a client is removed as the result of a SQUIT message, the server |
| 604 |
SHOULD add the nickname to the list of temporarily unavailable |
| 605 |
nicknames in an attempt to prevent future nickname collisions. See |
| 606 |
|
| 607 |
section 5.7 (Tracking recently used nicknames) for more information |
| 608 |
on this procedure. |
| 609 |
|
| 610 |
Numeric replies: |
| 611 |
|
| 612 |
ERR_NOPRIVILEGES ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 613 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS |
| 614 |
|
| 615 |
Example: |
| 616 |
|
| 617 |
SQUIT tolsun.oulu.fi :Bad Link ? ; the server link tolson.oulu.fi |
| 618 |
has been terminated because of "Bad |
| 619 |
Link". |
| 620 |
|
| 621 |
:Trillian SQUIT cm22.eng.umd.edu :Server out of control ; message |
| 622 |
from Trillian to disconnect |
| 623 |
"cm22.eng.umd.edu" from the net |
| 624 |
because "Server out of control". |
| 625 |
|
| 626 |
4.2 Channel operations |
| 627 |
|
| 628 |
This group of messages is concerned with manipulating channels, their |
| 629 |
properties (channel modes), and their contents (typically users). In |
| 630 |
implementing these, a number of race conditions are inevitable when |
| 631 |
users at opposing ends of a network send commands which will |
| 632 |
ultimately clash. It is also REQUIRED that servers keep a nickname |
| 633 |
history to ensure that wherever a <nick> parameter is given, the |
| 634 |
server check its history in case it has recently been changed. |
| 635 |
|
| 636 |
4.2.1 Join message |
| 637 |
|
| 638 |
Command: JOIN |
| 639 |
Parameters: <channel>[ %x7 <modes> ] |
| 640 |
*( "," <channel>[ %x7 <modes> ] ) |
| 641 |
|
| 642 |
The JOIN command is used by client to start listening a specific |
| 643 |
channel. Whether or not a client is allowed to join a channel is |
| 644 |
checked only by the local server the client is connected to; all |
| 645 |
other servers automatically add the user to the channel when the |
| 646 |
command is received from other servers. |
| 647 |
|
| 648 |
Optionally, the user status (channel modes 'O', 'o', and 'v') on the |
| 649 |
channel may be appended to the channel name using a control G (^G or |
| 650 |
ASCII 7) as separator. Such data MUST be ignored if the message |
| 651 |
wasn't received from a server. This format MUST NOT be sent to |
| 652 |
clients, it can only be used between servers and SHOULD be avoided. |
| 653 |
|
| 654 |
The JOIN command MUST be broadcast to all servers so that each server |
| 655 |
knows where to find the users who are on the channel. This allows |
| 656 |
optimal delivery of PRIVMSG and NOTICE messages to the channel. |
| 657 |
|
| 658 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 659 |
|
| 660 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_BANNEDFROMCHAN |
| 661 |
ERR_INVITEONLYCHAN ERR_BADCHANNELKEY |
| 662 |
ERR_CHANNELISFULL ERR_BADCHANMASK |
| 663 |
ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL ERR_TOOMANYCHANNELS |
| 664 |
ERR_TOOMANYTARGETS ERR_UNAVAILRESOURCE |
| 665 |
RPL_TOPIC |
| 666 |
|
| 667 |
Examples: |
| 668 |
|
| 669 |
:WiZ JOIN #Twilight_zone ; JOIN message from WiZ |
| 670 |
|
| 671 |
4.2.2 Njoin message |
| 672 |
|
| 673 |
Command: NJOIN |
| 674 |
Parameters: <channel> [ "@@" / "@" ] [ "+" ] <nickname> |
| 675 |
*( "," [ "@@" / "@" ] [ "+" ] <nickname> ) |
| 676 |
|
| 677 |
The NJOIN message is used between servers only. If such a message is |
| 678 |
received from a client, it MUST be ignored. It is used when two |
| 679 |
servers connect to each other to exchange the list of channel members |
| 680 |
for each channel. |
| 681 |
|
| 682 |
Even though the same function can be performed by using a succession |
| 683 |
of JOIN, this message SHOULD be used instead as it is more efficient. |
| 684 |
The prefix "@@" indicates that the user is the "channel creator", the |
| 685 |
character "@" alone indicates a "channel operator", and the character |
| 686 |
'+' indicates that the user has the voice privilege. |
| 687 |
|
| 688 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 689 |
|
| 690 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL |
| 691 |
ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED |
| 692 |
|
| 693 |
Examples: |
| 694 |
|
| 695 |
:ircd.stealth.net NJOIN #Twilight_zone :@WiZ,+syrk,avalon ; NJOIN |
| 696 |
message from ircd.stealth.net |
| 697 |
announcing users joining the |
| 698 |
#Twilight_zone channel: WiZ with |
| 699 |
channel operator status, syrk with |
| 700 |
voice privilege and avalon with no |
| 701 |
privilege. |
| 702 |
|
| 703 |
4.2.3 Mode message |
| 704 |
|
| 705 |
The MODE message is a dual-purpose command in IRC. It allows both |
| 706 |
usernames and channels to have their mode changed. |
| 707 |
|
| 708 |
When parsing MODE messages, it is RECOMMENDED that the entire message |
| 709 |
be parsed first, and then the changes which resulted passed on. |
| 710 |
|
| 711 |
It is REQUIRED that servers are able to change channel modes so that |
| 712 |
"channel creator" and "channel operators" may be created. |
| 713 |
|
| 714 |
5. Implementation details |
| 715 |
|
| 716 |
A the time of writing, the only current implementation of this |
| 717 |
protocol is the IRC server, version 2.10. Earlier versions may |
| 718 |
implement some or all of the commands described by this document with |
| 719 |
NOTICE messages replacing many of the numeric replies. Unfortunately, |
| 720 |
due to backward compatibility requirements, the implementation of |
| 721 |
some parts of this document varies with what is laid out. One |
| 722 |
notable difference is: |
| 723 |
|
| 724 |
* recognition that any LF or CR anywhere in a message marks |
| 725 |
the end of that message (instead of requiring CR-LF); |
| 726 |
|
| 727 |
The rest of this section deals with issues that are mostly of |
| 728 |
importance to those who wish to implement a server but some parts |
| 729 |
also apply directly to clients as well. |
| 730 |
|
| 731 |
5.1 Connection 'Liveness' |
| 732 |
|
| 733 |
To detect when a connection has died or become unresponsive, the |
| 734 |
server MUST poll each of its connections. The PING command (See "IRC |
| 735 |
Client Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT]) is used if the server doesn't get a |
| 736 |
response from its peer in a given amount of time. |
| 737 |
|
| 738 |
If a connection doesn't respond in time, its connection is closed |
| 739 |
using the appropriate procedures. |
| 740 |
|
| 741 |
5.2 Accepting a client to server connection |
| 742 |
|
| 743 |
5.2.1 Users |
| 744 |
|
| 745 |
When a server successfully registers a new user connection, it is |
| 746 |
REQUIRED to send to the user unambiguous messages stating: the user |
| 747 |
identifiers upon which it was registered (RPL_WELCOME), the server |
| 748 |
name and version (RPL_YOURHOST), the server birth information |
| 749 |
(RPL_CREATED), available user and channel modes (RPL_MYINFO), and it |
| 750 |
MAY send any introductory messages which may be deemed appropriate. |
| 751 |
|
| 752 |
In particular the server SHALL send the current user/service/server |
| 753 |
count (as per the LUSER reply) and finally the MOTD (if any, as per |
| 754 |
the MOTD reply). |
| 755 |
|
| 756 |
After dealing with registration, the server MUST then send out to |
| 757 |
other servers the new user's nickname (NICK message), other |
| 758 |
information as supplied by itself (USER message) and as the server |
| 759 |
could discover (from DNS servers). The server MUST NOT send this |
| 760 |
information out with a pair of NICK and USER messages as defined in |
| 761 |
"IRC Client Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT], but MUST instead take advantage |
| 762 |
of the extended NICK message defined in section 4.1.3. |
| 763 |
|
| 764 |
5.2.2 Services |
| 765 |
|
| 766 |
Upon successfully registering a new service connection, the server is |
| 767 |
subject to the same kind of REQUIREMENTS as for a user. Services |
| 768 |
being somewhat different, only the following replies are sent: |
| 769 |
RPL_YOURESERVICE, RPL_YOURHOST, RPL_MYINFO. |
| 770 |
|
| 771 |
After dealing with this, the server MUST then send out to other |
| 772 |
servers (SERVICE message) the new service's nickname and other |
| 773 |
information as supplied by the service (SERVICE message) and as the |
| 774 |
server could discover (from DNS servers). |
| 775 |
|
| 776 |
5.3 Establishing a server-server connection. |
| 777 |
|
| 778 |
The process of establishing a server-to-server connection is fraught |
| 779 |
with danger since there are many possible areas where problems can |
| 780 |
occur - the least of which are race conditions. |
| 781 |
|
| 782 |
After a server has received a connection following by a PASS/SERVER |
| 783 |
pair which were recognized as being valid, the server SHOULD then |
| 784 |
reply with its own PASS/SERVER information for that connection as |
| 785 |
well as all of the other state information it knows about as |
| 786 |
described below. |
| 787 |
|
| 788 |
When the initiating server receives a PASS/SERVER pair, it too then |
| 789 |
checks that the server responding is authenticated properly before |
| 790 |
accepting the connection to be that server. |
| 791 |
|
| 792 |
5.3.1 Link options |
| 793 |
|
| 794 |
Server links are based on a common protocol (defined by this |
| 795 |
document) but a particular link MAY set specific options using the |
| 796 |
PASS message (See Section 4.1.1). |
| 797 |
|
| 798 |
5.3.1.1 Compressed server to server links |
| 799 |
|
| 800 |
If a server wishes to establish a compressed link with its peer, it |
| 801 |
MUST set the 'Z' flag in the options parameter to the PASS message. |
| 802 |
If both servers request compression and both servers are able to |
| 803 |
initialize the two compressed streams, then the remainder of the |
| 804 |
communication is to be compressed. If any server fails to initialize |
| 805 |
the stream, it will send an uncompressed ERROR message to its peer |
| 806 |
and close the connection. |
| 807 |
|
| 808 |
The data format used for the compression is described by RFC 1950 |
| 809 |
[ZLIB], RFC 1951 [DEFLATE] and RFC 1952 [GZIP]. |
| 810 |
|
| 811 |
5.3.1.2 Anti abuse protections |
| 812 |
|
| 813 |
Most servers implement various kinds of protections against possible |
| 814 |
abusive behaviours from non trusted parties (typically users). On |
| 815 |
some networks, such protections are indispensable, on others they are |
| 816 |
superfluous. To require that all servers implement and enable such |
| 817 |
features on a particular network, the 'P' flag is used when two |
| 818 |
servers connect. If this flag is present, it means that the server |
| 819 |
protections are enabled, and that the server REQUIRES all its server |
| 820 |
links to enable them as well. |
| 821 |
|
| 822 |
Commonly found protections are described in sections 5.7 (Tracking |
| 823 |
recently used nicknames) and 5.8 (Flood control of clients). |
| 824 |
|
| 825 |
5.3.2 State information exchange when connecting |
| 826 |
|
| 827 |
The order of state information being exchanged between servers is |
| 828 |
essential. The REQUIRED order is as follows: |
| 829 |
|
| 830 |
* all known servers; |
| 831 |
|
| 832 |
* all known client information; |
| 833 |
|
| 834 |
* all known channel information. |
| 835 |
|
| 836 |
Information regarding servers is sent via extra SERVER messages, |
| 837 |
client information with NICK and SERVICE messages and channels with |
| 838 |
NJOIN/MODE messages. |
| 839 |
|
| 840 |
NOTE: channel topics SHOULD NOT be exchanged here because the TOPIC |
| 841 |
command overwrites any old topic information, so at best, the two |
| 842 |
sides of the connection would exchange topics. |
| 843 |
|
| 844 |
By passing the state information about servers first, any collisions |
| 845 |
with servers that already exist occur before nickname collisions |
| 846 |
caused by a second server introducing a particular nickname. Due to |
| 847 |
the IRC network only being able to exist as an acyclic graph, it may |
| 848 |
be possible that the network has already reconnected in another |
| 849 |
location. In this event, the place where the server collision occurs |
| 850 |
indicates where the net needs to split. |
| 851 |
|
| 852 |
5.4 Terminating server-client connections |
| 853 |
|
| 854 |
When a client connection unexpectedly closes, a QUIT message is |
| 855 |
generated on behalf of the client by the server to which the client |
| 856 |
was connected. No other message is to be generated or used. |
| 857 |
|
| 858 |
5.5 Terminating server-server connections |
| 859 |
|
| 860 |
If a server-server connection is closed, either via a SQUIT command |
| 861 |
or "natural" causes, the rest of the connected IRC network MUST have |
| 862 |
its information updated by the server which detected the closure. |
| 863 |
The terminating server then sends a list of SQUITs (one for each |
| 864 |
server behind that connection). (See Section 4.1.6 (SQUIT)). |
| 865 |
|
| 866 |
5.6 Tracking nickname changes |
| 867 |
|
| 868 |
All IRC servers are REQUIRED to keep a history of recent nickname |
| 869 |
changes. This is important to allow the server to have a chance of |
| 870 |
keeping in touch of things when nick-change race conditions occur |
| 871 |
with commands manipulating them. Messages which MUST trace nick |
| 872 |
changes are: |
| 873 |
|
| 874 |
* KILL (the nick being disconnected) |
| 875 |
|
| 876 |
* MODE (+/- o,v on channels) |
| 877 |
|
| 878 |
* KICK (the nick being removed from channel) |
| 879 |
|
| 880 |
No other commands need to check nick changes. |
| 881 |
|
| 882 |
In the above cases, the server is required to first check for the |
| 883 |
existence of the nickname, then check its history to see who that |
| 884 |
nick now belongs to (if anyone!). This reduces the chances of race |
| 885 |
conditions but they can still occur with the server ending up |
| 886 |
affecting the wrong client. When performing a change trace for an |
| 887 |
above command it is RECOMMENDED that a time range be given and |
| 888 |
entries which are too old ignored. |
| 889 |
|
| 890 |
For a reasonable history, a server SHOULD be able to keep previous |
| 891 |
nickname for every client it knows about if they all decided to |
| 892 |
change. This size is limited by other factors (such as memory, etc). |
| 893 |
|
| 894 |
5.7 Tracking recently used nicknames |
| 895 |
|
| 896 |
This mechanism is commonly known as "Nickname Delay", it has been |
| 897 |
proven to significantly reduce the number of nickname collisions |
| 898 |
resulting from "network splits"/reconnections as well as abuse. |
| 899 |
|
| 900 |
In addition of keeping track of nickname changes, servers SHOULD keep |
| 901 |
track of nicknames which were recently used and were released as the |
| 902 |
result of a "network split" or a KILL message. These nicknames are |
| 903 |
then unavailable to the server local clients and cannot be re-used |
| 904 |
(even though they are not currently in use) for a certain period of |
| 905 |
time. |
| 906 |
|
| 907 |
The duration for which a nickname remains unavailable SHOULD be set |
| 908 |
considering many factors among which are the size (user wise) of the |
| 909 |
IRC network, and the usual duration of "network splits". It SHOULD |
| 910 |
be uniform on all servers for a given IRC network. |
| 911 |
|
| 912 |
5.8 Flood control of clients |
| 913 |
|
| 914 |
With a large network of interconnected IRC servers, it is quite easy |
| 915 |
for any single client attached to the network to supply a continuous |
| 916 |
stream of messages that result in not only flooding the network, but |
| 917 |
also degrading the level of service provided to others. Rather than |
| 918 |
require every 'victim' to provide their own protection, flood |
| 919 |
protection was written into the server and is applied to all clients |
| 920 |
except services. The current algorithm is as follows: |
| 921 |
|
| 922 |
* check to see if client's `message timer' is less than current time |
| 923 |
(set to be equal if it is); |
| 924 |
|
| 925 |
* read any data present from the client; |
| 926 |
|
| 927 |
* while the timer is less than ten (10) seconds ahead of the current |
| 928 |
time, parse any present messages and penalize the client by two (2) |
| 929 |
seconds for each message; |
| 930 |
|
| 931 |
* additional penalties MAY be used for specific commands which |
| 932 |
generate a lot of traffic across the network. |
| 933 |
|
| 934 |
This in essence means that the client may send one (1) message every |
| 935 |
two (2) seconds without being adversely affected. Services MAY also |
| 936 |
be subject to this mechanism. |
| 937 |
|
| 938 |
5.9 Non-blocking lookups |
| 939 |
|
| 940 |
In a real-time environment, it is essential that a server process |
| 941 |
does as little waiting as possible so that all the clients are |
| 942 |
serviced fairly. Obviously this requires non-blocking IO on all |
| 943 |
network read/write operations. For normal server connections, this |
| 944 |
was not difficult, but there are other support operations that may |
| 945 |
cause the server to block (such as disk reads). Where possible, such |
| 946 |
activity SHOULD be performed with a short timeout. |
| 947 |
|
| 948 |
5.9.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups |
| 949 |
|
| 950 |
Using the standard resolver libraries from Berkeley and others has |
| 951 |
meant large delays in some cases where replies have timed out. To |
| 952 |
avoid this, a separate set of DNS routines were written for the |
| 953 |
current implementation. Routines were setup for non-blocking IO |
| 954 |
operations with local cache, and then polled from within the main |
| 955 |
server IO loop. |
| 956 |
|
| 957 |
5.9.2 Username (Ident) lookups |
| 958 |
|
| 959 |
Although there are numerous ident libraries (implementing the |
| 960 |
"Identification Protocol" [IDENT]) for use and inclusion into other |
| 961 |
programs, these caused problems since they operated in a synchronous |
| 962 |
manner and resulted in frequent delays. Again the solution was to |
| 963 |
write a set of routines which would cooperate with the rest of the |
| 964 |
server and work using non-blocking IO. |
| 965 |
|
| 966 |
6. Current problems |
| 967 |
|
| 968 |
There are a number of recognized problems with this protocol, all of |
| 969 |
which are hoped to be solved sometime in the near future during its |
| 970 |
rewrite. Currently, work is underway to find working solutions to |
| 971 |
these problems. |
| 972 |
|
| 973 |
6.1 Scalability |
| 974 |
|
| 975 |
It is widely recognized that this protocol does not scale |
| 976 |
sufficiently well when used in a large arena. The main problem comes |
| 977 |
from the requirement that all servers know about all other servers |
| 978 |
and clients and that information regarding them be updated as soon as |
| 979 |
it changes. It is also desirable to keep the number of servers low |
| 980 |
so that the path length between any two points is kept minimal and |
| 981 |
the spanning tree as strongly branched as possible. |
| 982 |
|
| 983 |
6.2 Labels |
| 984 |
|
| 985 |
The current IRC protocol has 4 types of labels: the nickname, the |
| 986 |
channel name, the server name and the service name. Each of the four |
| 987 |
types has its own domain and no duplicates are allowed inside that |
| 988 |
domain. Currently, it is possible for users to pick the label for |
| 989 |
any of the first three, resulting in collisions. It is widely |
| 990 |
recognized that this needs reworking, with a plan for unique names |
| 991 |
for nicks that don't collide being desirable as well as a solution |
| 992 |
allowing a cyclic tree. |
| 993 |
|
| 994 |
6.2.1 Nicknames |
| 995 |
|
| 996 |
The idea of the nickname on IRC is very convenient for users to use |
| 997 |
when talking to each other outside of a channel, but there is only a |
| 998 |
finite nickname space and being what they are, it's not uncommon for |
| 999 |
several people to want to use the same nick. If a nickname is chosen |
| 1000 |
by two people using this protocol, either one will not succeed or |
| 1001 |
both will be removed by use of KILL (See Section 3.7.1 of "IRC Client |
| 1002 |
Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT]). |
| 1003 |
|
| 1004 |
6.2.2 Channels |
| 1005 |
|
| 1006 |
The current channel layout requires that all servers know about all |
| 1007 |
channels, their inhabitants and properties. Besides not scaling |
| 1008 |
well, the issue of privacy is also a concern. A collision of |
| 1009 |
channels is treated as an inclusive event (people from both nets on |
| 1010 |
channel with common name are considered to be members of it) rather |
| 1011 |
than an exclusive one such as used to solve nickname collisions. |
| 1012 |
|
| 1013 |
This protocol defines "Safe Channels" which are very unlikely to be |
| 1014 |
the subject of a channel collision. Other channel types are kept for |
| 1015 |
backward compatibility. |
| 1016 |
|
| 1017 |
6.2.3 Servers |
| 1018 |
|
| 1019 |
Although the number of servers is usually small relative to the |
| 1020 |
number of users and channels, they too are currently REQUIRED to be |
| 1021 |
known globally, either each one separately or hidden behind a mask. |
| 1022 |
|
| 1023 |
6.3 Algorithms |
| 1024 |
|
| 1025 |
In some places within the server code, it has not been possible to |
| 1026 |
avoid N^2 algorithms such as checking the channel list of a set of |
| 1027 |
clients. |
| 1028 |
|
| 1029 |
In current server versions, there are only few database consistency |
| 1030 |
checks, most of the time each server assumes that a neighbouring |
| 1031 |
server is correct. This opens the door to large problems if a |
| 1032 |
connecting server is buggy or otherwise tries to introduce |
| 1033 |
contradictions to the existing net. |
| 1034 |
|
| 1035 |
Currently, because of the lack of unique internal and global labels, |
| 1036 |
there are a multitude of race conditions that exist. These race |
| 1037 |
conditions generally arise from the problem of it taking time for |
| 1038 |
messages to traverse and effect the IRC network. Even by changing to |
| 1039 |
unique labels, there are problems with channel-related commands being |
| 1040 |
disrupted. |
| 1041 |
|
| 1042 |
7. Security Considerations |
| 1043 |
|
| 1044 |
7.1 Authentication |
| 1045 |
|
| 1046 |
Servers only have two means of authenticating incoming connections: |
| 1047 |
plain text password, and DNS lookups. While these methods are weak |
| 1048 |
and widely recognized as unsafe, their combination has proven to be |
| 1049 |
sufficient in the past: |
| 1050 |
|
| 1051 |
* public networks typically allow user connections with only few |
| 1052 |
restrictions, without requiring accurate authentication. |
| 1053 |
|
| 1054 |
* private networks which operate in a controlled environment often |
| 1055 |
use home-grown authentication mechanisms not available on the |
| 1056 |
internet: reliable ident servers [IDENT], or other proprietary |
| 1057 |
mechanisms. |
| 1058 |
|
| 1059 |
The same comments apply to the authentication of IRC Operators. |
| 1060 |
|
| 1061 |
It should also be noted that while there has been no real demand over |
| 1062 |
the years for stronger authentication, and no real effort to provide |
| 1063 |
better means to safely authenticate users, the current protocol |
| 1064 |
offers enough to be able to easily plug-in external authentication |
| 1065 |
methods based on the information that a client can submit to the |
| 1066 |
server upon connection: nickname, username, password. |
| 1067 |
|
| 1068 |
7.2 Integrity |
| 1069 |
|
| 1070 |
Since the PASS and OPER messages of the IRC protocol are sent in |
| 1071 |
clear text, a stream layer encryption mechanism (like "The TLS |
| 1072 |
Protocol" [TLS]) could be used to protect these transactions. |
| 1073 |
|
| 1074 |
8. Current support and availability |
| 1075 |
|
| 1076 |
Mailing lists for IRC related discussion: |
| 1077 |
General discussion: ircd-users@irc.org |
| 1078 |
Protocol development: ircd-dev@irc.org |
| 1079 |
|
| 1080 |
Software implementations: |
| 1081 |
ftp://ftp.irc.org/irc/server |
| 1082 |
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/irc |
| 1083 |
ftp://coombs.anu.edu.au/pub/irc |
| 1084 |
|
| 1085 |
Newsgroup: alt.irc |
| 1086 |
|
| 1087 |
9. Acknowledgements |
| 1088 |
|
| 1089 |
Parts of this document were copied from the RFC 1459 [IRC] which |
| 1090 |
first formally documented the IRC Protocol. It has also benefited |
| 1091 |
from many rounds of review and comments. In particular, the |
| 1092 |
following people have made significant contributions to this |
| 1093 |
document: |
| 1094 |
|
| 1095 |
Matthew Green, Michael Neumayer, Volker Paulsen, Kurt Roeckx, Vesa |
| 1096 |
Ruokonen, Magnus Tjernstrom, Stefan Zehl. |
| 1097 |
|
| 1098 |
10. References |
| 1099 |
|
| 1100 |
[KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate |
| 1101 |
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
| 1102 |
|
| 1103 |
[ABNF] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax |
| 1104 |
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997. |
| 1105 |
|
| 1106 |
[IRC] Oikarinen, J. and D. Reed, "Internet Relay Chat |
| 1107 |
Protocol", RFC 1459, May 1993. |
| 1108 |
|
| 1109 |
[IRC-ARCH] Kalt, C., "Internet Relay Chat: Architecture", RFC 2810, |
| 1110 |
April 2000. |
| 1111 |
|
| 1112 |
[IRC-CLIENT] Kalt, C., "Internet Relay Chat: Client Protocol", RFC |
| 1113 |
2812, April 2000. |
| 1114 |
|
| 1115 |
[IRC-CHAN] Kalt, C., "Internet Relay Chat: Channel Management", RFC |
| 1116 |
2811, April 2000. |
| 1117 |
|
| 1118 |
[ZLIB] Deutsch, P. and J-L. Gailly, "ZLIB Compressed Data |
| 1119 |
Format Specification version 3.3", RFC 1950, May 1996. |
| 1120 |
|
| 1121 |
[DEFLATE] Deutsch, P., "DEFLATE Compressed Data Format |
| 1122 |
Specification version 1.3", RFC 1951, May 1996. |
| 1123 |
|
| 1124 |
[GZIP] Deutsch, P., "GZIP file format specification version |
| 1125 |
4.3", RFC 1952, May 1996. |
| 1126 |
|
| 1127 |
[IDENT] St. Johns, M., "The Identification Protocol", RFC 1413, |
| 1128 |
February 1993. |
| 1129 |
|
| 1130 |
[TLS] Dierks, T. and C. Allen, "The TLS Protocol", RFC 2246, |
| 1131 |
January 1999. |
| 1132 |
|
| 1133 |
11. Author's Address |
| 1134 |
|
| 1135 |
Christophe Kalt |
| 1136 |
99 Teaneck Rd, Apt #117 |
| 1137 |
Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660 |
| 1138 |
USA |
| 1139 |
|
| 1140 |
EMail: kalt@stealth.net |
| 1141 |
|
| 1142 |
12. Full Copyright Statement |
| 1143 |
|
| 1144 |
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. |
| 1145 |
|
| 1146 |
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to |
| 1147 |
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it |
| 1148 |
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published |
| 1149 |
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any |
| 1150 |
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are |
| 1151 |
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this |
| 1152 |
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing |
| 1153 |
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other |
| 1154 |
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of |
| 1155 |
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for |
| 1156 |
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be |
| 1157 |
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than |
| 1158 |
English. |
| 1159 |
|
| 1160 |
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be |
| 1161 |
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. |
| 1162 |
|
| 1163 |
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an |
| 1164 |
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING |
| 1165 |
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING |
| 1166 |
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION |
| 1167 |
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF |
| 1168 |
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. |
| 1169 |
|
| 1170 |
Acknowledgement |
| 1171 |
|
| 1172 |
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the |
| 1173 |
Internet Society. |