[ViewVC] Diff of: svn/ircd-hybrid/branches/8.2.x/configure

Comparing ircd-hybrid/trunk/configure (file contents):
Revision 2334 by michael, Sun Jun 23 17:32:44 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 2347 by michael, Wed Jul 3 19:09:32 2013 UTC

+#! /bin/sh
-<
+# From configure.ac Id: configure.ac 2318 2013-06-21 17:47:52Z michael .
->
+# From configure.ac Id: configure.ac 2334 2013-06-23 17:32:44Z michael .
+# Guess values for system-dependent variables and create Makefiles.
+# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69 for ircd-hybrid TRUNK.
+ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu
-<
+am__api_version='1.13'
->
+am__api_version='1.14'
+ac_aux_dir=
+for ac_dir in "$srcdir" "$srcdir/.." "$srcdir/../.."; do
-+
+# POSIX will say in a future version that running "rm -f" with no argument
-+
+# is OK; and we want to be able to make that assumption in our Makefile
-+
+# recipes.  So use an aggressive probe to check that the usage we want is
-+
+# actually supported "in the wild" to an acceptable degree.
-+
+# See automake bug#10828.
-+
+# To make any issue more visible, cause the running configure to be aborted
-+
+# by default if the 'rm' program in use doesn't match our expectations; the
-+
+# user can still override this though.
-+
+if rm -f && rm -fr && rm -rf; then : OK; else
-+
+  cat >&2 <<'END'
-+
+Oops!
-+
-+
+Your 'rm' program seems unable to run without file operands specified
-+
+on the command line, even when the '-f' option is present.  This is contrary
-+
+to the behaviour of most rm programs out there, and not conforming with
-+
+the upcoming POSIX standard: <http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=542>
-+
-+
+Please tell bug-automake@gnu.org about your system, including the value
-+
+of your $PATH and any error possibly output before this message.  This
-+
+can help us improve future automake versions.
-+
-+
+END
-+
+  if test x"$ACCEPT_INFERIOR_RM_PROGRAM" = x"yes"; then
-+
+    echo 'Configuration will proceed anyway, since you have set the' >&2
-+
+    echo 'ACCEPT_INFERIOR_RM_PROGRAM variable to "yes"' >&2
-+
+    echo >&2
-+
+  else
-+
+    cat >&2 <<'END'
-+
+Aborting the configuration process, to ensure you take notice of the issue.
-+
-+
+You can download and install GNU coreutils to get an 'rm' implementation
-+
+that behaves properly: <http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/>.
-+
-+
+If you want to complete the configuration process using your problematic
-+
+'rm' anyway, export the environment variable ACCEPT_INFERIOR_RM_PROGRAM
-+
+to "yes", and re-run configure.
-+
-+
+END
-+
+    as_fn_error $? "Your 'rm' program is bad, sorry." "$LINENO" 5
-+
+  fi
-+
+fi
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... " >&6; }
+ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5'
+ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu
-+
+ac_ext=c
-+
+ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS'
-+
+ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
-+
+ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5'
-+
+ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu
-+
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CC understands -c and -o together" >&5
-+
+$as_echo_n "checking whether $CC understands -c and -o together... " >&6; }
-+
+if ${am_cv_prog_cc_c_o+:} false; then :
-+
+  $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
-+
+else
-+
+  cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
-+
+/* end confdefs.h.  */
-+
-+
+int
-+
+main ()
-+
+{
-+
-+
+  ;
-+
+  return 0;
-+
+}
-+
+_ACEOF
-+
+  # Make sure it works both with $CC and with simple cc.
-+
+  # Following AC_PROG_CC_C_O, we do the test twice because some
-+
+  # compilers refuse to overwrite an existing .o file with -o,
-+
+  # though they will create one.
-+
+  am_cv_prog_cc_c_o=yes
-+
+  for am_i in 1 2; do
-+
+    if { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: $CC -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest2.$ac_objext" >&5
-+
+   ($CC -c conftest.$ac_ext -o conftest2.$ac_objext) >&5 2>&5
-+
+   ac_status=$?
-+
+   echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5
-+
+   (exit $ac_status); } \
-+
+         && test -f conftest2.$ac_objext; then
-+
+      : OK
-+
+    else
-+
+      am_cv_prog_cc_c_o=no
-+
+      break
-+
+    fi
-+
+  done
-+
+  rm -f core conftest*
-+
+  unset am_i
-+
+fi
-+
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $am_cv_prog_cc_c_o" >&5
-+
+$as_echo "$am_cv_prog_cc_c_o" >&6; }
-+
+if test "$am_cv_prog_cc_c_o" != yes; then
-+
+   # Losing compiler, so override with the script.
-+
+   # FIXME: It is wrong to rewrite CC.
-+
+   # But if we don't then we get into trouble of one sort or another.
-+
+   # A longer-term fix would be to have automake use am__CC in this case,
-+
+   # and then we could set am__CC="\$(top_srcdir)/compile \$(CC)"
-+
+   CC="$am_aux_dir/compile $CC"
-+
+fi
-+
+ac_ext=c
-+
+ac_cpp='$CPP $CPPFLAGS'
-+
+ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
-+
+ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5'
-+
+ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu
-+
-+
+depcc="$CC"   am_compiler_list=
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking dependency style of $depcc" >&5

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines (old)
->
+Changed lines (new)

Comparing ircd-hybrid/trunk/configure (file contents): Revision 2334 by michael, Sun Jun 23 17:32:44 2013 UTC vs. Revision 2347 by michael, Wed Jul 3 19:09:32 2013 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing ircd-hybrid/trunk/configure (file contents):
Revision 2334 by michael, Sun Jun 23 17:32:44 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 2347 by michael, Wed Jul 3 19:09:32 2013 UTC